Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Paulreisler




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete as spam. Beeblebrox (talk) 09:05, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

User:Paulreisler
Account used only for self-promotion in userspace. Also partially a copyvio. Psychonaut (talk) 14:50, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Valid sandbox use. Reisler may have notability on his own -- two seconds found  from the New York Times. Collect (talk) 15:13, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. First person spam + copyvio. MER-C 03:03, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. First section clearly a copyright violation of and the rest falls foul of WP:PROMOTION and WP:NOTADVERTISING - promotional, as it's basically a long advert for Kid Pan Alley. JulieSpaulding 12:52, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.