Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Pavithra.gdlru/Mudaliar Kuppam

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  '''delete as unsalvageably promotional. Now go do something useful. Maybe write a fresh article about that subject instead of using a promotional brochure.''' DS (talk) 19:10, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

User:Pavithra.gdlru/Mudaliar Kuppam



 * (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 01:04, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 06:03, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Promotional material that would require a complete rewrite to be used. Long stale draft. Legacypac (talk) 17:57, 31 March 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:00, 9 April 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:04, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Unworthy for discussion. Unworthy for the MfD nomination, and unworthy for relisting.  Relisting implies that someone thinks it deserves more consideration, and they were wrong.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:58, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Move to mainspace at Mudaliar Kuppam and merge/redirect to Tamil Nadu Tourism Development Corporation. Rather than criticizing the administrator here, let's try something useful. There's no evidence that this singular initiative is or will be a notable program and the development corporation article is severely lacking in well anything. The two references could be incorporated into the corporation article or it could not be, there's little there that's usable to me. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:04, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * ARGGH no. I am trying to stop excessive discussions, not move inappropriate stuff to mainspace.  Either leave it alone (I don't believe it was placed here as promotion) or blank it as mild promotion, or delete as promotion per nom, but no it does not belong in mainspace.  The page is worthless and harmless, but the nom's statement is completely correct.   --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:34, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * There's been no discussion and thus the relistings. Why not discuss the matter rather than argue about relisting it? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 22:01, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * When the completed discussions at the bottom are closed, the discussions that are neglected but deserving of discussion will be more obvious. This nomination is a prime example of a page not worthy of discussion, that serves only to clutter MfD.  Ironic that someone claiming to want to clear clutter makes so much clutter.  North America 1000 tripled the clutter.  There are so many junk nominations currently that it is hard to find non-junk.
 * Merge/redirect to Tamil Nadu Tourism Development Corporation may be the right thing to do. Deletion is not.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:42, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * That's one reason we should rename MFD to Miscellany for discussion. Deletion is largely not the only option. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 21:31, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * SNOW rejected previously. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:38, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * It would be scope creep, so much as to kill MfD as a useful process, the lesson is at Notability/Noticeboard
 * It would overlap Third opinion, Requests for comment and Dispute resolution noticeboard. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:06, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.