Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Peenident/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Speedy deleted again. I can parse enough of this "dialect" to determine that this was vandalism and not in any way an attempt to add anything useful to Wikipedia. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:26, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

User:Peenident/sandbox


As a previous reviewer said, this is patently not a viable article, although it does not meet any of the criteria for a speedy delete. It appears to be written in some sort of rendition of a dialect of English, and is not neutral, and may be fiction or a personal reflection. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:40, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Page has been speedily deleted. --LukeSurlt c 12:59, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * ANd now has been recreated with more of the same gibberish. Liz  Read! Talk! 16:36, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The previous version was marginally readable, being in some sort of rendition of a dialect. This version is incomprehensible.  I have tagged it as patent nonsense.  Letting MFD run, because author is likely to resubmit if speedied.  Author has been given template for disruptive editing.  If this sandbox is deleted and re-created, I will request a block.  Robert McClenon (talk) 20:35, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.