Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Perfectblue97/shadow1


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy keep Bad faith nom. -- Cat chi? 16:10, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Perfectblue97/shadow1
This is an alternative version of the shadow people article that was created as a POV-fork and hidden in userspace in defiance of the third criterion of this of guideline, this guideline, and criterion 4 for CSD. ScienceApologist (talk) 18:46, 29 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Correction. This is a unfinished sandbox entry It is not a fork, but a work in progress for an update of an existing page (Shadow people. This is allowed for under POVFORK of WP:Fork.

It should be noted that the existence of this page is not advertised anywhere on Wikipedia, it is not included in any categories, and the only way to access it is either to back-check links or to search the User's edit history. This is clearly not a page intended for the eyes of anybody except those working on it.

It should also be noted that this page does not fall under the heading of a fork as defined by WP:Fork on the grounds that it it merely a refactoring of an existing page (Shadow People. It contains no content not contained in the original page and includes no new sources or citations. The page POV/NPOV remains identical to that on the original. The primary change is that

perfectblue (talk) 21:19, 29 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment. Assuming good faith, as Perfectblue97 says, if this is a sandbox created to write a version of article in order to add all he wants to write about the topic, I'd say give it a time. Eventually, there will have to be a debate about what from this page is to be included in the original article and then this subpage can be deleted. Calm down, there is no need to start accusing each other over some disagreement about the content. Only calmly you can reach a good article at the end. --Tone 22:01, 29 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. We get to keep drafts. —— Martinphi    ☎ Ψ Φ —— 01:58, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Bad faith nom. Jtrainor (talk) 03:51, 30 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.