Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Petrosianii/sandbox




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete --Xavexgoem (talk) 03:45, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

User:Petrosianii/sandbox
Sandbox owned by an editor that turned out to be a sock of an indef-blocked editor. Article was deleted at Articles for deletion/Edward Longley. Looking at the comments in the AfD, it's very unlikely that the draft can be improved to pass WP:N. -- Enric Naval (talk) 04:08, 13 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete as a user subpage of an indef-block user. E Wing (talk) 09:37, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete seeing "client1" for an earlier page implies to me that this may be connected with a current discussion on paying for articles. Collect (talk) 11:29, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: won't this speedy under G5--Elen of the Roads (talk) 12:59, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Per only the following: sandbox of a borderline BLP figure; user subpage of a sock account. There is no policy-based valid reason to delete for any of the "fiscal motivations" of the author, so any arguments along those lines are invalid. rootology ( C )( T ) 13:59, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.