Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:PhantasmicGhostHunters

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. --BDD (talk) 17:19, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

User:PhantasmicGhostHunters


WP:FAKEARTICLE about a non-notable show.  Taylor Trescott  - my talk + my edits 17:28, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Delete 100% non-notable, and clearly promotional. This is pretty-much admitted at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Phantasmic_Ghost_Hunters#Contested_deletion. Benboy00 (talk) 17:48, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
 * -_- which now doesn't exist. I should have forseen this. Benboy00 (talk) 19:12, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Part of it went like this, but i don't have a copy of the next part (i think there was a next part, but this part also showcases what i intended to show): "This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (Because we are creating the page for the fans to read up on the phantasmic Ghost Hunters, We are trying to add our episode lists, where we have gone and what we investigated. Now I have reviewed other Ghost hunting articles and I think and KNOW we are entering the same information on the pages. What PGH is, when it aired, whats the show about, who stars in it, what do they do, episode list. If this is not the format then you MUST and need to remove the Ghost Adventures, Ghost Hunters, and all other ones.) --PhantasmicGhostHunters (talk) 17:27, 19 October 2013 (UTC)" Not sure why it was in brackets. Benboy00 (talk) 19:25, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I remember the next part. It was saying that this user was the PR rep for the show (or the people who owned the show, or something) and how the show had had some high number of views (although no sources were presented). The important part, i think, is that the user clearly stated that they were effectively a paid advocate. Benboy00 (talk) 21:45, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
 * This was after my comment: "The way you are talking (along with your username) implies heavily that you are part of "PGH". It is strongly discouraged for you to start an article with a subject that you have a stake in (see WP:COI). It is also likely that you will be blocked as your username seems to be in violation of WP:USERNAME. This show also seems to be non-notable, and is pretty much a slam-dunk speedy delete. Benboy00 (talk) 17:47, 19 October 2013 (UTC)" Benboy00 (talk) 21:46, 19 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a marketing medium. User has been blocked indefinitely and was clearly not here to build an encyclopedia. MER-C 05:12, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - User indef blocked, and Phantasmic Ghost Hunters already deleted as purely promotional. Statements from self-professed COI user demonstrate their sole intent is self-promotion. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 22:53, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.