Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Pheonix255/the pro-tie movement

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete — G FOLEY   F OUR  — 03:37, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

User:Pheonix255/the pro-tie movement
Probable hoax in userspace, delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST. Acather96 (talk) 13:12, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep-- for now. Give him a chance to work on it. It was created today, has a userspace draft tag, and the user has a history of 8 other edits which were not vandalism. This seems a little WP:BITEY to me right now.  In a month, I would delete it. --  E♴    (talk)  15:22, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Changed to Delete-- I don't know what I was thinking before. A quick google search reveals this to be made-up. --  E♴    (talk)  15:49, 6 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete give him a chance to work on a blatant hoax? Yeah right. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 20:35, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE, which states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion." Because this page violates WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 03:26, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree with TenPoundHammer that no time should be given to this user to continue working on a hoax. Delete per WP:NOTMADEUP. Cunard (talk) 03:26, 6 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. I'm not sure this could ever be developed into something that would be appropriate for Wikipedia or even for userspace. However, if the page creator wants to explain his motivation for creating this page, I'd be interested in finding out what that is. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:57, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Hoax, silliness, or unconstructive humour, it doesn't belong.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:46, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.