Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Phillipbeynon/Mrs. Whyte’s


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. PeterSymonds (talk)  19:00, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

User:Phillipbeynon/Mrs. Whyte’s
Userbox is only transcluded on one page and contains a red link. I see no purpose for this userbox. (Note: I could've asked the user, but they seem to have retired). If this userbox is deleted, I will copy the code to the user's page. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 17:28, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose as per the fact that it does indeed exist. NuclearWarfare  contact me My work  19:12, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Per NuclearWarfare's statement. ĈőмρǖтέŗĠύʎ890100 (t ↔ Ĕ ↔ ώ) 23:19, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Still, it doesn't seem notable enough for a page (I had no doubt it existed), but wouldn't it be easier just to copy the coding to the user's page, since they're the only one using this userbox? Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 23:26, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose per above. But tell the user that they can do the same with Userbox. Bart133 t c @ How's my driving? 02:19, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * They haven't edited in years tho. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 04:05, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.