Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Pierdomenico Buda Rosa

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. JohnCD (talk) 20:53, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

User:Pierdomenico Buda Rosa


WP:FAKEARTICLE; WP:USERBIO. ZZArch talk to me 09:23, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

this bio is genuine sirs!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pierdomenico Buda Rosa (talk • contribs) 11:07, 28 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete-The concern is not necessarily that the material is not genuine, but rather that it is not appropriate. While putting some information about oneself on the user page is fine (that's one of the main things its for, in fact), using it for pages like this that are written like an article is not, especially given that, being that the prose is not in English, it is clearly not suitable as an article. In the future, I'd encourage the nominator to make his nominations more comprehensive (ie, more than just policy links) so as to avoid this sort of confusion. --Fyre2387 (talk • contribs) 15:58, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to Italian Wikipedia and delete here. Stifle (talk) 10:24, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * You cannot say transwiki without checking it's notability. Sorry. J u n k c o p s (want to talk?|my log) 18:07, 31 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete is it remains unsourced. Blank if it fail WP:BIO, and delete after a a few weeks.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:54, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.