Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Polysophia/Gualias

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. No consensus to delete. However, I'm about to redirect it to Gialias as an independent action because as it turns out, the second longest river in Cyprus has an article under that spelling. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 01:44, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

User:Polysophia/Gualias

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

U5 ineligible, editor last edited in 2012 and stub that I can't find any relevant other article to redirect to Sennecaster  ( Chat ) 00:55, 5 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. Is mentioned at Pera Chorio.  It appears to be true.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:57, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment - This is a stale draft, and the user page guidelines say that stale drafts by inactive users may be moved to draft space. They do not specify criteria for when such an action is appropriate.  Maybe we need a guideline on when stale drafts should be moved to draft space.  Robert McClenon (talk) 18:01, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
 * It is not stale. The information is not going off. SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:13, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Move to Draft Space - If an editor supplies a reference, it can be accepted. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:01, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Absolutely not - you're citing WP:STALE, which says if the draft is not problematic (e.g. no BLP, reliability, promotional issues) but not ready for mainspace, let it be;. It also says Userspace drafts which do not meet article content standards should not be moved to mainspace in order to seek deletion. This move to draftspace is plainly just an end-run around deletion rules, and thus should be understood in the spirit of the language there (and the long RfCs which led to it). &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 22:50, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:TIND. Doesn't appear to be a hoax, and abandoned userspace can just be left alone. —  csc -1 17:58, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - if it doesn't qualify for CSD, there's almost never a reason to mess with other people's userspace. Not seeing a reason here. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 22:50, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.