Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Porkchop28/Vandalism Patrol


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was keep. &mdash;harej (talk) (cool!) 17:32, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

User:Porkchop28/Vandalism Patrol
It has the same idea that the vandalism patrol made by Programmer and me had which was deleted. So using the reasons for that deletion like its not appropriate for an encyclopedia etc. this should also be deleted. At Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Programmer13/Vandalism Patrol M onkey  F ox  Contributes!   .  20:19, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Even if not a good idea, ideas directed to project improvement should not be deleted.  If redundant, merge and redirect.  A link to the past deletion discussion would be helpful.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:19, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The WP:CSD deletion offers no precedent to consider here. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:04, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Agreed with SmokeyJoe, it's directed to project improvement. It's pretty much redundant in every way to WP:CVU however, so I'm on the fence. I'll give keep for the simple project improvement reason. GrooveDog (talk) (Review) 05:12, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as completely redundant. Ironholds (talk) 11:28, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.