Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Postyourmedia/Flurb It


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was delete--Aervanath (talk) 05:54, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

User:Postyourmedia/Flurb It
Draft advertisement for non-notable website; sitting unimproved since 2008. Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  03:00, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete A good faith attempt at an article, but it is basically advertising. I suspect that the author needs to read WP:COI.  Also Alternative outlets.  Of course, on request, allow the user access to the deleted materal for off-wikipedia purposes.   --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:16, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as spam. Alexius08 (talk) 09:18, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep It's a sandbox for an article. Regardless of how long it has or hasn't been worked on, it's not even linked from his/her userpage, so I fail to see how it's a blatant spam/advertising issue. Raven1977 Talk to me My edits  15:41, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Not sure if it was the intent of the author, but it is basically advertising. Chillum  17:31, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete It was "good faith attmpt" a year ago. It sizzled. Done with it. Laudak (talk) 21:15, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep It is not written as an advertisement. There is no time limit for developing an article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:47, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Really? It looks like a pamphlet to me. Chillum  16:01, 7 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep Per Raven1997 and Graeme Bartlett. - Fastily (talk) 21:50, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, untouched for nearly a year. Stifle (talk) 14:12, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. The web site is gone, and there's no coverage in news or - in fact - anywhere else online. Unless the web site miraculously reappears and becomes popular, there's no chance this will ever be a notable subject for an article. (Even if there were any effort put into writing it, which - well - isn't happening, seeing as how the author's last edit was userfying this a year ago.) Zetawoof(&zeta;) 02:58, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.