Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Prashanth Ignatius/C Innasappa

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Keep no consensus. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:03, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

User:Prashanth Ignatius/C Innasappa

 * CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:09, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Non-English. ~ Rob 13 Talk 01:26, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep . "Not-English" is not a reason for deletion.  This page was used to translate corresponding articles between here and  kn.wikipedia.org.  Translating and transwikiing between different language is a valid use of userpsace.  To be encouraged, even.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:16, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:09, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * This is an over three-year-old draft with 0% of its content translated to English. I see absolutely no evidence to suggest that the purpose of this page is translation,, as this contributor has never written a word of English on the project. ~ Rob 13 Talk 04:27, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
 * All of that may be true, but it is not a good reason to delete. Support of sister projects is a Todd use of userspace. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:08, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
 * There's no evidence this does support sister projects. Have you found a specific article this is a translation of? It appears unlikely to be an article (or potential article) based on the Google Translate version of it. ~ Rob 13 Talk 05:23, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
 * It contains multiple historically interesting facts, embedded in a rambling story. A bit Indian in style if I may risk being rude. I think, at best, it is a copy of a source intended for conversion to an article. I've defended a few pages like this, committed to "not English is not a sufficient reason for deletion", but on examination again, this is a weak case. I wouldn't argue with "probable copyright infringement" as it is a complete work and I can't find the source. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:29, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Probably delete, on examination, but not per the nomination rationale "Not-English". --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:34, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Rob asked "Have you found a specific article this is a translation of?". The think the corresponding page is https://kn.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%B2%B8%E0%B2%BF.%E0%B2%87%E0%B2%A8%E0%B3%8D%E0%B2%A8%E0%B2%BE%E0%B2%B8%E0%B2%AA%E0%B3%8D%E0%B2%AA
 * I think the person is a recent historical (died November 26, 1997) and notable figure, weakly notable largely due to being historical, but I note that the kn.wikipedia is a WP:Orphan, and is also noted to have no external links (which might mean no sources). I am content to see this deleted with this reference by me to https://kn.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%B2%B8%E0%B2%BF.%E0%B2%87%E0%B2%A8%E0%B3%8D%E0%B2%A8%E0%B2%BE%E0%B2%B8%E0%B2%AA%E0%B3%8D%E0%B2%AA, which seems to have the same content, possibly improved.  This usersubpage is by the same contributor, and preserving it doesn't provide any attribution information.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:07, 28 January 2017 (UTC) Image of the subject, C.Innsappa.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:13, 28 January 2017 (UTC)


 * I'd have liked to asked for assistance from Kannada language translator, but cannot find one. I do note that kn.wikipedia.org as 21 thousand articles (0.4% of en), 4 admins, and 243 active users.  If we were to come across a Kannada/English editor, we should bend over backwords to encourage them, not delete their userpages.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:24, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.