Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Praveen P Unnithan/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:51, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

User:Praveen P Unnithan/sandbox


No chance of satisfying WP:GNG. Editor has been asked on multiple occasions to provide inline citations but refuses. David. moreno 72   08:40, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: No evidence provided to support a claim of notability despite plenty opportunity. Lack of proper engagement with the reviewer's feedback suggests that this is going nowhere. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:54, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment: From discussions that have taken place on the AFC reviewer talk page I think it has been highlighted that reviewers shouldn't focus on the need for inline citations as the decline reason when there are more important issues with the article i.e. notability. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:57, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.