Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Professor X Factor

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 12:47, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

User:Professor X Factor


Appears to be copy pasted resume Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 03:45, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
 * blank no need to delete, just reduce the promotion. The user has attempted to edit some other pages even though it was spam. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:57, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Blank, watch, delete If it gets unblanked, then delete. Gigs (talk) 15:35, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
 * As per Gigs, but no objection to "Delete now that we're here", but note that these such pages should be merely blanked on discovery, preferably with a human note to the author. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:17, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, oppose blanking per WP:NOTRESUME, WP:NOTADVERTISING, and WP:NOTWEBHOST. There is no reason to retain this resume by a single-purpose account that had only three edits: one to create this page, a spam edit at Shopping.com, and a spam edit at BeatThatQuote.com. It wastes less editor resources to delete it now since it is at MfD rather than renominate it if it is unblanked. Cunard (talk) 23:27, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, to be clear, I didn't mean bring it back to MfD, I meant delete it outright based on this discussion. Gigs (talk) 13:37, 22 May 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.