Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Proofreader77/Checkuser OK

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep..  MBisanz  talk 20:37, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

User:Proofreader77/Checkuser OK


unused userbox Beeblebrox (talk) 21:59, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note. All eight of these subpages of User:Proofreader77 have the same basic rationale: unused subpage of blocked user.  I believe they will all have the same basic keep and delete rationales.  I request that people about to comment here consider commenting at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Proofreader77/Rhetorical Interaction Orchestration and Analysis instead, to reduce the number of near-identical discussions to monitor.  If absolutely necessary, I suppose I can copy/paste things everywhere, but that seems confusing. --Floquenbeam (talk) 15:08, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I've never heard of retroactively forcing a bundled nomination. These pages are not all exactly the same thing and do not all have exactly the same issues, so I deliberately did not do


 * Keep. I see an element of comment on a project issue. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:59, 3 March 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.