Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Proofreader77/The Sublimely Dramalicious Mock-Around-the-Clockery 2010

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep..  MBisanz  talk 20:38, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

User:Proofreader77/The Sublimely Dramalicious Mock-Around-the-Clockery 2010


weird nonsense in the userspace of a long-term blocked user Beeblebrox (talk) 22:03, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note. All eight of these subpages of User:Proofreader77 have the same basic rationale: unused subpage of blocked user.  I believe they will all have the same basic keep and delete rationales.  I request that people about to comment here consider commenting at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Proofreader77/Rhetorical Interaction Orchestration and Analysis instead, to reduce the number of near-identical discussions to monitor.  If absolutely necessary, I suppose I can copy/paste things everywhere, but that seems confusing. --Floquenbeam (talk) 15:08, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
 * See, you're just wrong about that. This page isn't the same as all the other pages. It appears to be a page for mocking WP:DRAMAOUT, but all that is on it is the author giggling at their own non-funny joke. Even if they were still an active user, this page would not be an appropriate use of user space. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:24, 2 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. Reasonable person notes of an editor.  Is it impossible that this user will ever return?  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:15, 17 March 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.