Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Pseudo-Richard/Jews and banking

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 02:41, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

User:Pseudo-Richard/Jews and banking


Per WP:STALEDRAFT. After the deletion of the articles Jews and money / Economic history of the Jews, and the topic-banning of their creator in Arbitration/Requests/Case/Noleander, User:Pseudo-Richard had their contents userfied into a series of drafts. None of these drafts have been worked on since mid-2011; Pseudo-Richard hasn't edited significantly since 2012, and at all since 2015. This would also include:
 * User:Pseudo-Richard/Economic history of the Jews,
 * User:Pseudo-Richard/Role of Jews in the development of capitalism,
 * User:Pseudo-Richard/Money notes, and
 * User:Pseudo-Richard/Antisemitism and the Left, all of which were created in whole or part from the original deleted articles. Jayjg (talk) 20:26, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

✅
 * Comment - I am about to work this into a bundled nomination for all of the user drafts listed above. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:01, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - As per nomination, these are stale drafts. They are also of questionable encyclopedic value as inherently biased, especially in view of their history.  Therefore:
 * Delete all. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:13, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete all as stale drafts with no potential, since their originals have been deleted by AfD. Draft space is not a mechanism for working around article deletion. -- The Anome (talk) 08:57, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete all we should clean things up like this Legacypac (talk) 09:34, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete all per WP:UP. All are copy-pasted from a later deleted article, and at a minimum represent a serious attribution hazard.  Any proposal to re-work and improve the old deleted content must either start fresh or start from a full history undeletion.  I guess this was copy-pasted during the AfDs, a bad practice that should be firmly discouraged.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:17, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.