Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Pstark/Minnesota citizens concerned for life

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Move and history merge as per Cross-namespace redirects CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 07:10, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

User:Pstark/Minnesota citizens concerned for life
Stale draft from July 2009. Didn't bother asking the user to speedy it since hir last edit was also in July 2009. Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 07:52, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:STALEDRAFT with corresponding mainspace article Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life. User has not made any edits outside this topic. MER-C 10:40, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. This doesn't have anything worth keeping, and we have a mainspace article. --  E♴    (talk)  15:52, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:STALEDRAFT. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 15:27, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life. Looking at the two histories, this page is not a stale draft, but is the userspace draft preceding a copy-paste move.  The appropriate remedy is to redirect.  Deleting the majority of this welcome contributor's edits is not very nice, considering the possibility that he may return to edit one day, which is an assumption we should try to always make.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:53, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Joe. - Haymaker (talk) 05:39, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
 * History merge User:Pstark/Minnesota citizens concerned for life and Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life to keep the history of the article's development intact. (The article is based on this userspace draft.) History merge only the 2009 revisions. Delete the subsequent revisions because they do not contain any content relevant to the article's development. Cunard (talk) 11:23, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.