Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:PuppyOnTheRadio/thing

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  speedy deleted WP:CSD at author request. JohnCD (talk) 13:05, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

User:PuppyOnTheRadio/thing


We have a semi-wiki-looking teenage rape fantasy kind of thing. Not the sort of content we should rent server space for. Drmies (talk) 04:57, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Which is why it's in my userspace, and has been changed completely, and is being hosted on Wikia servers elsewhere, and was moved here purely as it gave me the opportunity to destroy it somewhere else, as I also don't think it should be hosted here. In short, might have been better talking to me first. PuppyOnTheRadio (talk) 06:48, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Puppy, just to be clear, it is your intention to have that page removed under WP:CSD G7: Author Request Deletion? Achowat (talk) 13:05, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * And does the same apply to User:PuppyOnTheRadio/thing two? Also G7? Drmies (talk) 17:56, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The latter page only indirectly relates to the former - the offending material isn't in the history of the second page - it's just my feelings about it. (Much the same as this page reflects another users feelings towards it, just less articulately put.) As for the former, I've blanked it, but someone would have to be desperate to go through the history of that to find the offensive material, which as I said is already hosted on Wikia servers (through Uncyclopedia, but I'm working on removing it.) Those pages are really just a way I can write stuff that is destined for Uncyclopedia when I only have access to Wikipedia due to my employers wonderful firewall. (I can't access the style sheet for wikia or any Wikipedia commons stuff, so it comes through looking ugly and imageless.) But if you really want to delete the first page, go for it. As for the second - it's a different page with a different history and would need a different nomination for mfd, but I've done what I wanted with it - it will still sit in the servers, accessible by admins only, so there's no justification for deletion though. (And what does semi-wiki-looking actually mean?) PuppyOnTheRadio (talk) 06:40, 11 February 2012 (UTC)


 * If this relates to the project, then keeping it temporarily and blanked should be OK, but I don't think that wikia stuff is sufficiently related to WikiPedia. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:22, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Same servers, and the concern was partially server space. PuppyOnTheRadio (talk)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.