Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Qiubozheng


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was  Delete. Eluchil404 19:21, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

User:Qiubozheng
This is the authors "personal portfolio page of Knowledge sharing and contributions to the minor study course..." Appears that other than a few attempts at vanity articles, (Michaelzheng and Qiubozheng), the only edits this user has made in the couple months they've been here are to their user page. I left a message about WP:NOT on their talk page a few weeks ago which was removed without comment. Page has been deleted in the past as a copyvio, and it appears portions of the current version might also qualify it, but the many minor changes that have been made are making it difficult to find any large blatant chunks of copyvio. --Onorem♠Dil 14:30, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not your webhost. Thanks, Codelyoko193 (T/C) 22:36, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:NOT, wikipedia is not a webhost.--SJP 00:21, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 02:04, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - User has not responded to queries, and Wikipedia is not a webhost. Neran e i   (talk) 03:57, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - not a webhost. – Mike .lifeguard  &#124; @en.wb 04:25, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete looks like a personal page not related to encyclopedia work. O2  (息 • 吹) 01:22, 07 November 2007 (GMT)
 * Delete per nom. Wannabekate proves instructive in showing us what the user has been up to. --jonny-mt(t)(c) Tell me what you think! 07:06, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. They were contacted weeks ago and ignored the message. Deleting this page is not harmful to the community. Seraphim Whipp 13:10, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Since they actually ignored the message a few weeks ago, then we would not be bitting this user.--SJP:Happy Verterans Day! 13:16, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi. Is that comment directed at me? I completely agree; the user had ample warning and has made no mainspace contributions. Deleting this page is not harmful to wikipedia, as we're not going to lose an editor whose goal is to improve wikipedia. Seraphim Whipp 14:07, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * No it was not directed at you. I was just sharing my opinion and taking part in the Mfd process. Cheers!--SJP:Happy Verterans Day! 14:51, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks :o). Seraphim Whipp 15:42, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per all the above indicating that this site is not a free webhost. John Carter 16:40, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Not a webhost, ignored warning. -- Beloved Freak  22:17, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.