Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Qtangel7772


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete, seen enough of this debate to presume consensus, and Wikipedia is, according to foundation policy, obviously not a social networking site anyways.  Daniel.Bryant  04:49, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

User:Qtangel7772
Using this page for messages, apparently. Was warned by another editor and deleted the warning. 02:26, 22 February 2007 — Preceding unsigned comment added by TomXP411 (talk • contribs)
 * Also the following: &mdash;Dgiest c 06:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * User:Timo3331
 * User talk:Timo3331
 * User:The World as we Know It
 * User talk:The World as we Know It


 * Speedy delete - violation of WP:NOT - using Wikipedia as a social networking/personal website. User has done no edits to any articles or article talk pages.  -- John Broughton  (♫♫) 05:13, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Violating WP:NOT is a deletion criteria, but I don't see anything that is a speedy deletion criteria. &mdash;Dgiest c 06:54, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Worse type of user page abuse in a way. —Doug Bell talk 06:22, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. and above. John Reaves (talk) 06:27, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Also recommend deletion of User:Timo3331, User talk:Timo3331, User:The World as we Know It and User talk:The World as we Know It as they were also used for their "message board". -- Gogo Dodo 06:29, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all - To follow proper procedure, I placed MfD tags on the extra pages. &mdash;Dgiest c 07:01, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I got lazy. My bad. =\ -- Gogo Dodo 07:03, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all This user apparently seems to think Wikipedia is some sort of personal Myspace, no reason to keep these templates. Telly   addict Editor review! 12:38, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete now that the user has been politely warned and ignored the warning. ~  ONUnicorn (Talk problem solving 16:03, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete because Wikipedia not an IM Service or forum. -- Cyrus Andiron  t/c 19:05, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I was going to MfD these, but you beat me to it. :) Dar-Ape 23:07, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. I protected User:Qtangel7772 until the end of this MfD. —Doug Bell talk 23:21, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a IM service. While it is good for editors to message each other to collaborate on articles and improve, it is unacceptable to use it solely for communication purpose. Wooyi 21:29, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. This is not what user pages are for. --Core desat  00:25, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, this content (and the editor who created it) is useless to the project. bd2412  T 02:42, 24 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.