Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:QuackGuru/Sand3

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, should be kept NOINDEX'ed. — xaosflux  Talk 03:45, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

User:QuackGuru/Sand3


The page should be deleted as it is a WP:FAKEARTICLE (of E-cigarette). -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 17:35, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. It is not a fake article. I have made a number of changes and continue to make changes to the page. QuackGuru  ( talk ) 17:39, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Read the link . WP:FAKEARTICLE states that the userspace must not indefinitely contain articles that look like mainspace articles. -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 17:43, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep & Comment on the word indefinite. The sandbox is only a year old, and QG has been working on it regularly during that period. From what I can garner off TPs and archives (correct me if I'm wrong), QG is heavily involved in the improvement/rewrite of our existing E-cig article. The one in the sandbox is an expanded version, so it will resemble an article quite closely. Unlike my stubs, articles usually aren't written in a short space of time. Unless QG plans on permanently keeping his version in the sandbox till the end of time, I think he should be able to keep it. If a discussion is held, and his finished version is decided against, then we'll see. L3X1 (distænt write)   )evidence(  18:30, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep I posted Userspace draft to this page. Userpages in development which look like articles are supposed to have that template. If the article is not edited for a while, and if it seems like a problem, then it can be blanked and tagged with Userpage blanked. It is not customary to delete user drafts in progress.  Blue Rasberry   (talk)  18:25, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep — But I agree that it should have the draft tag. It also should be non-indexed.  Appears non-identical to the main article and had recent-enough edits to be considered active.  Appears to not be a POV fork.   — Paleo  Neonate  - 03:08, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - Agree with Blue Rasberry and L3X1 Cloudjpk (talk) 23:33, 8 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.