Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:ROSCC




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:55, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

User:ROSCC
Advertising page, COI account has only made edits to their pages. Glass  Cobra  05:03, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Also nominating the following related page:


 * Keep Write nicely to the person.  This is non-commercial, and appears to be a UK version of Mske A Wish.  Not a time for WP:BITE to be sure. Collect (talk) 13:44, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * As above, write nicely and help re-write. If these two articles were merged there is probably an article there that passes notability. Or, just do it for them. There were active for at least a week and that was within the last month. Come back and revisit this in a few more weeks if nothing happens. Miami33139 (talk) 18:02, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Merge the main userpage into the RoS page (leave a redirect), and with a little bit of work the end result could likely be moved into mainspace. //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 20:12, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I don't really see this as advertising, although I suppose it is vaguely promotional. However, I don't think it's promotional enough to warrant deletion. This could very well be an article on a subject that is sufficiently notable for mainspace. The new user should be assisted in this case, not bitten. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 20:23, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep (actually, Blank the userpage and Keep subpage) This needs work, but there is no reason why it should not become an article. Rays of Sunshine is indeed like the Make-A-Wish Foundation. --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 23:10, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment An article called Rays of Sunshine has been created twice, both times deleted as Speedy Dels: on 11 December 2008 it was deleted as A7 (group): No indication that the article may meet guidelines for inclusion, on 12 December 2008 it was deleted as G1: Patent nonsense, meaningless, or incomprehensible. Obviously, what we have here would not meet those criteria. --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 23:10, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
 * is from a govenment-affiliated site for King's College Hospital mentioning the charity. Cetainly not "patent nonsense" to be sure. Time to snow close, I suspect. Collect (talk) 14:19, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.