Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Rachel0898/Nina Power

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. MER-C 03:39, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

User:Rachel0898/Nina Power


The original article was deleted via this AfD after I nominated the page for deletion based on concerns raised via OTRS. contested the deletion on the the deleting admin's talk page whereupon the admin restored the page in this userspace quoting WP:REFUND. Since it's move here nearly two years ago, the article has remained untouched and unimproved which appears to be an end-run around the deletion. Given the BLP, privacy and notability concerns that lead to the original deletion I see no purpose on hosting the material here indefinitely simply because the editor hosting it disagreed with the outcome of the AfD. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 16:37, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I've added noindex to let it sink in search engines. Deryck C. 08:51, 5 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - User space is not an indefinite holding pen for deleted material. Despite asking for the undeletion to work on the article, there has been exactly zero edits from this editor to the article.  -- Whpq (talk) 11:20, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.