Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Rachiddebbagh




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Deleted Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 22:39, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

User:Rachiddebbagh
A userpage being used to host a political essay; user has made few contributions outside this page. There are additionally some image licensing issues with the photos of currency, and they should probably be correctly licensed and removed from the page even if the main determination here is to keep. (ESkog)(Talk) 18:17, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

My own userpage being used to host my personal thoughts that fit as a profile ; go mind your own contributions and userpage then. There is no photos of currency as it is an image I created with paint software and is licensed correctly furthermore the image of currency included in it is to a great extent opensource it is is not a couterfeit that can be used as means of exchange of goods. Indeed besides that the main determination is to keep therefore propose the deleting of the image rather. (Rachiddebbagh)(Talk) 18:31, 1 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, I say. There are also several extremely racist and otherwise offensive comments (including mentions of dismemberment) on the user's page. TheDestitutionOfOrganizedReligion (talk) 18:49, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

I will go through the page and I will identify these threats and erase them.(Rachiddebbagh)(Talk) 21:51, 1 May 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.217.150.8 (talk)
 * Delete - Wikipedia is not a soapbox. John Carter (talk) 21:19, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete This is a soapbox, it also contains threats and legal threats.  There is nothing to do with Wikipedia here. Normally I would select blank, but we don't want the history visible either. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:47, 1 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment - the subject also boasts about murdering several people. I have to wonder whether that is remotely acceptable. John Carter (talk) 21:55, 1 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Userpage deleted - user has also been indef blocked for conduct incompatible with the encyclopedia. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 22:27, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.