Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Radianti666

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 00:18, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

User:Radianti666

 * (added at 23:26, 21 June 2011 (UTC))
 * (added at 23:26, 21 June 2011 (UTC))

Use of userspace for partisan soapboxing, contrary to our userspace guidelines: this is not what user pages are for. Radianti666's only contributions are to this page. While I don't doubt his sincerity and desire to communicate his feelings, this content doesn't belong on Wikipedia. It's too one-sided and biased to ever make it into an article in mainspace. Robofish (talk) 10:41, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. If user intended to make this into an article he never proceeded with it. Material is not usable in its present form. Now a year old, so stale. -- Klein zach  11:09, 21 June 2011 (UTC)


 * User:Radianti666 has blanked his userpage and started again at User:Radianti666/draft1, incidentally, so I have added it to this nomination. Delete both as inappropriate use of userspace. BencherliteTalk 23:26, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
 * ... and now he's blanked that as well, removing the MfD tag in the process. Can't be bothered to reinstate it.  Both pages still need deleting so that the old history isn't simply brought back to life when attention moves on. BencherliteTalk 00:42, 24 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep the main user page, as any actionable content has been replaced. If oversight is required, that's a different discussion. I have tagged the /draft1 page for speedy deletion as G7 (user blanked).-- &#124;  Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  17:34, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete both per WP:SOAP. See Sockpuppet investigations/Radianti666 for information about . There is another MfD, Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DeeCeeVee, related to this content. Despite the page's having been blanked, I believe its history should be deleted per WP:NOTWEBHOST of this POV content. Cunard (talk) 08:16, 28 June 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.