Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Rae Logan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.  &gt; R a d i a n t &lt;  10:01, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

User:Rae Logan
This user was contributing to Wikipedia until the "Felidanus" article was tagged and speedily deleted on 1 August. At that point the user recreated the material on her user page and almost all her edits since then have been to her user page. She has not edited anything since 14 October but her user page has been edited by 70.183.96.165. I believe that this violates What Wikipedia is not. Delete CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 00:06, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Yuser31415 01:24, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete inclined to agree. Dar-Ape
 * Delete agreed, its mostly use of the page as a webspace and user's contribution history says it all.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 20:22, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. James086Talk 13:10, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.