Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Rajbaz/Rajput draft

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  no consensus. Daniel (talk) 17:43, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

User:Rajbaz/Rajput draft

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;
 * NotAGenious (talk) 09:38, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Userpage article for Rajput in non-NPOV/promotional wording, unsourced. Not sure if WP:G11 applies. User is inactive since 2016. CptViraj (talk) 10:35, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - No one thing that is wrong with this coprolite is the reason to delete.  It isn't exactly G11.  It is stupid, and was left by a long-departed user.  Robert McClenon (talk) 04:32, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Extremely low quality writings of a subject that already has an article. Uhai (talk) 17:02, 1 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep. Reasonable drafty draft of a usersubpage. Not close to G11 eligible. MfD should not be used to curate old wikipedian’s subpages for writing quality or overlap with mainspace content.  If you really think is has no or negative value, use Userpage blanked. SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:28, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NotAGenious (talk) 09:38, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Drafts are cheap. There's always room for improvement as SmokeyJoe pointed out. — MATRIX! (a good person!)&#91;citation unneeded&#93; 19:58, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Weak keep. No compelling reason to delete a user's notes in their own userspace that are plausibly related to improving articles, absent other major issues. In this case, given the context and history, eventual productive use towards improving mainspace is pretty unlikely, but that's not a criterion we use in evaluating userspace pages for deletion. I say "weak" keep since I think eventually we will need a policy to delete long-untouched, never-used random userspace stuff by long-gone users, but we don't have such a policy yet. Martinp (talk) 15:06, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.