Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Rambogps


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted by Philippe. Chick Bowen 21:07, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

User:Rambogps
Userpage used for advertisement; user's only edit. Chick Bowen 04:27, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per nomination. MER-C 04:30, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I was going to just delete it, and then remembered a DRV of a similar page. But perhaps it was less straight-forward than this one--I'll see if I can find it. Chick Bowen 04:32, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * It was Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Efrym87, later considered at Deletion review/Log/2008 September 16. The difference here would be the advertising content, so I guess G11 would be appropriate.  I remember being quite surprised at how much objection there was to those earlier one-edit-per-user deletions, though. Chick Bowen 04:37, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * And it's gone. Yes, I agree that would make the difference. MER-C 04:43, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.