Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Randihoffman/Thaddeus Rutkowski

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was No consensus to delete. While this is not an appropriate final location for this content, there is no consensus to outright delete it at this time. — xaosflux  Talk  02:07, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

User:Randihoffman/Thaddeus Rutkowski


Moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thaddeus Rutkowski at some point. The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 16:31, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I see from Worldcat that his  novels are in between 50 and 100  libraries.  This would not be notability for a mainstream author, but it might be for someone in a niche like his. Move back to AfC, which will give 6 months to work on it before ww need look at it again. If Lurie's comment is actually a published review and not a blurb, it would go some distance towards notability.  DGG ( talk ) 03:39, 8 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Move to mainspace, cut section 3 and past on the talk page for possible follow-up. Decline for inadequate reference formating?! It is disconcerting that passing AfC is harder than passing AfD, no wonder AfC didn't work.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:23, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Please give me time to work on this page further and do not delete it - Randi Hoffman — Preceding unsigned comment added by Randihoffman (talk • contribs)
 * Note: Moved above comment here from before section title. jni (delete)...just not interested 15:44, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep and help the newbie. This seems salvageable and user who made this deletion nomination has yet to make a case why this should be deleted. jni (delete)...just not interested 15:44, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
 * History merge with Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thaddeus Rutkowski. This is a copy-paste fragment.  It's not needed as a separate page, although the decline templates should likely be moved to the new page.  Aggie80 wasn't suggesting that the user's work be deleted, only that this extra copy isn't needed.  About the decline reason: Wikipedia has a policy of inline citations in BLPs, so at Afc we lead the new users to include them before passing out the drafts.  There's been considerable discussion about this on the project talk page.  &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 11:58, 12 April 2014 (UTC)


 * The deletion was because there was already a page created in AfC. I thought I used the merge page as already in existence. The two pages should clearly be merged into the one in AfC.  The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 13:55, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.