Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Random89/supergroup

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux  Talk 15:23, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

User:Random89/supergroup

 * (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 19:16, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
 * (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 19:16, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Abandoned userspace draft of an unsourced article, not edited since 2008. Two Moons Rising (talk) 08:39, 8 June 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to Supergroup (music). --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:55, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 19:16, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Why would we want to hang onto it? —Compassionate727 (T·C) 19:28, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Consider commenting at Wikipedia_talk:Drafts.  Userspace drafts are quite similar.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:32, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
 * It is someone's userspace. No one goes there but the user.  Userspace subpages are the workspace for Wikipedians.  Interfering with others' workspaces is needlessly rude.  There is no benefit to the project in having people manage others' workspace.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:32, 19 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. It's been almost eight years since this was last edited and two since the editor was here. Again WP:OWN does apply to user workspaces and especially after eight years. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 21:57, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * No, the user doesn't OWN it, the community, as represented here, has the right to delete, move, redirect, archive, protect, SALT, etc.
 * The page is unsourced, the nom was correct, but the mainspace article Supergroup (music) is sourced, so the sourcing is not an issue. Beyond what is in the mainspace version, this userpage contains lists/tables of examples of supergroups.  If intended for mainspace, it seems random/incomplete and not based on sources, but alternatively, it could be considered the users notes on his editing intentions.  As such, it is appropriate to keep the history available to him.  Sure, if deleted, he could get it immediately undeleted at WP:REFUND, but that is pointless admin-heavy bureaucracy.  He is clearly not working to put it into mainspace against consensus, and if he doesn't return, it makes no difference to anything if the history is behind a redirect or behind a deleted page.
 * It has been almost two years since the editor last edited, but he previously took a three-year break. This shows that a couple of years of inactivity doesn't imply gone for good, and in any case, we don't disappear old editors.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:53, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Alright, how about a soft delete? If he returns in a year or later, he can request a refund for the page at WP:REFUND. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 00:54, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Let's delete now that we are here; the user will see the MfD notice, and this discussion mentions WP:REFUND. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:27, 29 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as redundant to Supergroup (music) and List of musical supergroups. No need to keep super old stuff around indefinitely. If by any chance (very slim chance) the editor returns, he should be encouraged to edit mainspace article. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:08, 29 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.