Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Rcsprinter123/Important bus routes in Derbyshire

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Speedy delete as requested by the page owner below.  Hut 8.5  21:30, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

User:Rcsprinter123/Important bus routes in Derbyshire


Stale draft, All bus routes in 2013 were deleted because most if not all were non notable, This probably wouldn't survive as a standalone article – Davey 2010 Talk 20:42, 12 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Can't be bothered to start a new MFD so listing this aswell for the same reasons - User:Rcsprinter123/Greater Manchester/Derbyshire Bus Route 202/341. – Davey 2010 Talk 02:18, 13 October 2015 (UTC)


 * I don't support this on principle, but rules are rules, so I won't be opposing.  Rcsprinter123    (spill beans)  09:21, 13 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. Blank at worst.  No driving reason to interfere with another Wikipedian's userspace.  The pettiness and possible bad feelings produced far exceed any negatives of such a page.  I have tagged it with  to deal with any possible concerns.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:00, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * It's not pettiness and there's no bad feelings - All of what I've nominated haven't been touched for a long time so why would we need to keep them ?, – Davey 2010 Talk 07:56, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Did you ask him? --SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:02, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * There was no need to ask him ? .... He gave up working on it so the correct thing to do is just nominate it like any other userspace item here?, Don't get me wrong like the rest here if they were working on it I would never have nominated them and if any of them want to work on them I'd happily withdrawn, I just don't see the point in keeping pages around if those editors don't edit them ? – Davey 2010 Talk 11:37, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I originally closed as Withdrawn/Blank but surprise surprise Mr Sprinter has an issue so instead of edit warring I've just reopened this. – Davey 2010 Talk 19:51, 14 October 2015 (UTC)


 * This is all irrelevant now because the page is nominated for speedy deletion. Please don't call me Mr Sprinter.  Rcsprinter123    (warn)  19:55, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.