Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Reachmean


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was Keep. NuclearWarfare  ( Talk ) 15:20, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

User:Reachmean
Editor's one and only edit to date, back in January, was the creation of this duplicated copy of the Karl Keating article. Creator of the page is being notified of this discussion. John Carter (talk) 18:33, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - it's not really causing any trouble. The article isn't deleted, so it doesn't violate any WP:UP policies that I'm aware of. – xeno  ( talk ) 18:39, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep the page is not harmful, but is the user's only contribution back in January. Blanking may be worthwhile in a year or so. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:53, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep I am in agreement with the previous comments. I don't see any harm from this page. Pastor Theo (talk) 03:01, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep It appears this person is concerned about "Novus Ordo" and while it may be pushing Sandbox, it does not break it. Collect (talk) 11:54, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep The user might have tried to save a copy of a specific version of the page, not knowing they could use a permlink, or they could be planning a major revamp. Without any BLP violations or other pressing matters, I see no reason to delete it. - Mgm|(talk) 10:00, 26 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.