Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Reagan and Helms

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Blank. Equal numbers of votes for delete/blank so I’m blanking as it’s easier and prevents a potential “no consensus” close. (non-admin closure) Dronebogus (talk) 13:20, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

User:Reagan and Helms

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Admitted ragpicking nom, but this user barely edited anything out of userspace and most of their page is a glorified blog post with wp:blp vios in it. Dronebogus (talk) 12:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nominator and I have disagreed about deleting userspaces before, but this is a case of a newbie who in 2009 spent their first 63 edits writing this extensive self-identification, then made 13 edits to other pagespace, then disappeared for good nine days later. I'd prefer we blank such material for future attribution (nominator and I generally agree to disagree on such matters), but in this case I don't think the pedia is injured by removing user information about this NOTHERE contributor. I'd be interested in hearing other POVs. BusterD (talk) 13:49, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Blank. I have reservations about deleting a user's main user page, but this is a clear WP:SOAPBOX and WP:NOTHERE issue. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 16:17, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. —  Sundostund  mppria  (talk / contribs) 21:01, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Blank: Due to Userpage content exceeding reasonable balance against their contributions, a lesser SOAPBOX violation. SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:40, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I don’t see the BLP violations in it. If I did, I would !vote to delete.  Autobiographical statements, and comments concerning public figures that are not contentious with respect to WP:V, while they may be BLP “issues”, are not BLP “violations”. SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:43, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Blank: I also don't see any clear BLP violations as the context was solely about the 2008 election. These candidates hear opinions from voters like these all the time. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:44, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete to remove it from view, and let the user create a reasonable user page if they can. The alternative would be to blank it by admin revdel.  Robert McClenon (talk) 06:54, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.