Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Rebel Prophet/Sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. RL0919 (talk) 02:39, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

User:Rebel Prophet/Sandbox


Possible hoax, certainly seems OR. See Articles for deletion/Bet Yitra and. In any case we are not a web host. Doug Weller talk 20:44, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete but I have tagged it for G4 as per the AFD. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:50, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Bad call. AfDs don’t establish G4 for userspace, not unless the AfD closer said so. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:57, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per Articles for deletion/Bet Yitra. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:57, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - I disagree with User:SmokeyJoe's action in untagging the G4, which I think should have been left to the reviewing admin. However, a contested CSD can be taken to a deletion discussion, so here we are, no harm, no foul.  Robert McClenon (talk) 22:19, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Applying G4 to userspace pages is long term controversial. In this case, the driving AfD reason for deletion was WP:NOR. WP:NOR is not a deletion reason in userspace. I reassert that it was a bad G4 tagging.  I support deletion here noting the extreme age of the draft, the questions of possible hoaxing, the lack of sources, and the authors long inactivity. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:24, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I concur with SmokeyJoe. G4 should be trimmed to read "and content that has been moved to user space or converted to a draft for explicit improvement (but not simply to circumvent Wikipedia's deletion policy) . Otherwise, the wording is too vague to be useful. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 20:34, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete This may be a hoax. &#8213; Susmuffin Talk 00:47, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
 * But you are not sure? --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:50, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per the AfD result. I'm not 100% convinced it is a hoax but appears to be WP:MADEUP because nothing meaningful comes up on sewrch results. I see refs and it has been carefully written but it is OR. I'm convinced the topic is not notable. Legacypac (talk) 18:25, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.