Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Redsox42311/Shaycarl




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:56, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

User:Redsox42311/Shaycarl
Is a recreation of an article which has been deleted 10+ times for lack of notability. Contains personal information of other persons without their consent. Edits have removed this personal information, but it has been re-added. No productive edits to this article have added any notability. Attempts to find any sources of information outside of 1st party sources turned up dry. ~ [ Scott M. Howard  ]:[  Talk  ] 20:09, 24 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Users should not be recreating repeatedly deleted material about living people in their userspace, especially when it invades privacy. Fences  &amp;  Windows  01:36, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * delete per Fences. Maybe salt as well to prevent further re-creation. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 01:04, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Notability is not a requirement in userspace. Contentious claims, per BLP, can be removed by anyone, to be sure. I do not see anything particularly contentious at this point.  Collect (talk) 14:38, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Userspace is not intended for permanently storing articles that we've repeatedly deleted, particularly BLPs. Fences  &amp;  Windows  20:36, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Collect is correct that notability is not required in userspace. However, WP:FAKEARTICLE says, "While userpages and subpages can be used as a development ground for generating new content, this space is not intended to indefinitely archive your preferred version of disputed or previously deleted content or indefinitely archive permanent content that is meant to be part of the encyclopedia." (mine emphasized) This userspace draft of a previously deleted article (over 10 times) about a non-notable individual violates the policy WP:NOTWEBHOST and should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 23:02, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.