Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Redvers/Say no to Commons (3rd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. MER-C 12:21, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

User:Redvers/Say no to Commons


Userpage of editor gone over 6 years. Disruptive in that it attacks editors of a sister project. Kelly hi! 20:17, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Valid project opinion. It is already dated, but a more prominent date and a retired notice could be added. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:02, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Simply disagreeing with its contents is not a valid reason to get rid of it, no matter how harshly written it is.-- Laun  chba  ller  20:40, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as an otherwise-permissible essay by a former regular. At most, this should have been blanked with inactive userpage blanked. Rebb  ing  22:19, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.