Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Renamed user 4/Problem editors

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Courcelles 05:48, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

User:Renamed user 4/Problem editors
Appears to be some record of past disagreements between editors, not used in any encyclopedic purposes. :| TelCo NaSp  Ve :|  00:44, 29 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Per nom. No place here.  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 03:17, 29 November 2010 (UTC)


 * But if the problem editor in question reappears on WP, it would be a useful record of his history. 271828182 (talk) 05:40, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * If the problem editor reappears, we have diffs and contributions histories as evidence. Until then, this fails WP:UP, which specifically states that "Users should generally not maintain in public view negative information related to others without very good reason. Negative evidence, laundry lists of wrongs, collations of diffs and criticisms related to problems, etc., should be removed, blanked, or kept privately (i.e., not on the wiki) if they will not be imminently used, and the same once no longer needed". "imminently used" is the test, and one not met here. Delete Ironholds (talk) 17:29, 2 December 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.