Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Retartist/hall of infamy

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  '''Delete. The title of the subpage makes it clear that this is a violation of WP:POLEMIC. The material can be preserved in a less disruptive manner, such as a link to a diff on a subpage with a less inflammatory title'''. Gamaliel ( talk ) 20:26, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

User:Retartist/hall of infamy


This is being kept in Retartist's userspace to spite me. There is no reason for this to be saved anywhere outside of the WP:AN archives when it gets archived. — Ryūlóng ( 琉竜 ) 06:25, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete No matter how subtle, a WP:POLEMIC is still a WP:POLEMIC. Oh look, my opponent asked for my side to be sanctioned at AN and failed! Ha ha! Johnuniq (talk) 07:03, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Move to User:Retartist/stuff's_i_was_in this is not there to spite you Ryulong, its there so i can look at it myself easily instead of trawling archives and more discussions may be added in the future. I concede that the title was inappropriate but you could have just asked me to remove it or change it rather than finding multiple excuses to have it deleted just because you didn't like the outcome of that discussion Retartist (talk) 07:26, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * You can bookmark it once it gets archived by the bot or just look up "gamergate bud" in the archives' search system. You don't need to copy it into your userspace.— Ryūlóng ( 琉竜 ) 08:11, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I may be collecting all discussions i was ever involved in there in the future so ill think on it Retartist (talk) 08:15, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Bookmark them instead of copying them.— Ryūlóng ( 琉竜 ) 08:45, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect per above?  Anon 126   (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 19:10, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Hardly polemic to copy discussions one has been involved in. Now, you could make an argument about the title of the page, sure it could be moved, but I don't see any problem with the editor's use of a discussion and copying all of it (and attributing per CC BY SA 3.0, which is allowed) but I really feel there's not much issue with it. I'd like more detail of Ryulong's 'Being kept just to spite me' bit, though. Tutelary (talk) 19:29, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * There is no need to keep a separate copy of this when it's going to be retained in the WP:AN archives. He can make a link to it but this is unnecessary.— Ryūlóng ( 琉竜 ) 19:56, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - It's not rocket science to simply bookmark it and or save the link on your laptop... – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  03:25, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per the reasons given by others, it is wholly unnecessary to retain one's own copy of an admin thread and give it a misleading/biased title. It is also way past overdue on a closure here, stumped across this while looking for the other page. Tarc (talk) 16:28, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - there is no reason to keep this other than as spoils of war. We don't do that here. I have a list of bookmarks to things I've done on my userpage - a lot of us do - but there is no valid reason at all for making copies of closed disciplinary threads. Ivanvector (talk) 20:02, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.