Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Rgreenberg95/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 04:33, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

User:Rgreenberg95/sandbox

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Hoax / alternative history sandbox of a user with few constructive edits (and none recently). Elli (talk &#124; contribs) 05:46, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
 *  Weak Delete as per nominator, but why is the nominator ragpicking? Robert McClenon (talk) 17:12, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I maintain US elections imagemap and United States presidential election imagemap and occasionally check transclusions on them. I don't go seeking out random userpages to delete. Though, these have been getting on my nerves a bit recently due to the quantity I've seen (many already deleted). Elli (talk &#124; contribs) 17:20, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment - Thank you for the explanation. This is not so much a case of ragpicking then as of the theft of the rags.  Robert McClenon (talk) 17:55, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, quite a clear case of WP:NOTWEBHOST. —  csc -1 04:09, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: This does not look like sandbox misuse; this looks like someone genuinely experimenting with a template. Aasim (talk) 20:52, 22 March 2021 (UTC) Nvm, I'd agree with deletion as this user has not made productive contributions to Wikipedia yet. Aasim (talk) 20:53, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.