Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Rhain1999/workspace/Lil' Rhain

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. BencherliteTalk 11:30, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

User:Rhain1999/workspace/Lil' Rhain


The editor has been warned repeatedly about creating WP:FAKEARTICLE but he continues to do so. WWGB (talk) 01:16, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * This isn't a fake article. I made a page on my workspace, continuing to build it with references, sources, and better information until it's sustainable for Wikipedia's requirements. Delete it if you like, but that's my hard work gone. Rhain1999 (talk) 01:18, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * You may be only 13 but surely you can understand that you are not notable according to Wikipedia guidelines. No "references, sources, and better information" will ever change this fact. WWGB (talk) 01:23, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * You never know, maybe one day I may become notable, and maybe that day will come soon?! But, yeah. I see why you want to delete the page. So, go ahead. Just remember me if I become famous! I'll give you a shoutout, WWGB! :) (I doubt I'll become famous, but still, worth a shot). Rhain1999 (talk) 01:45, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Like me, and like most other people in the world, you aren't notable enough for a Wikipedia article. As long as you are not notable, creating an article about yourself, even if it is in your userspace, is inappropriate. And even famous people shouldn't create articles about themselves. This is why. When you do become notable, somebody else will surely create an article about you sooner or later. --bonadea contributions talk 09:33, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm unsure here, but Rhain1999's logic seems (to me at least) to be at odds with WP:CRYSTALBALL; he 'might' become notable and deserving of an article so he's making one now just in case. Obviously WP:FAKEARTICLE is the more prominent concern. I've got a habit of making fake articles of my own, but I do those on my own computer and save them as documents there; maybe Rhain can do something similar and avoid further issues on here. Comics (talk) 06:18, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Good idea. Thanks for that. :) Rhain1999 (talk) 09:32, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. For reference see Miscellany for deletion/Rhain1999 and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Rhain1999/Purple sandbox. The same concerns still apply; WP:FAKEARTICLE, WP:NOTWEBHOST. --bonadea contributions talk 09:33, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - per above; if Rhain becomes notable it will likely not be for the information contained in this page. Achowat (talk) 18:02, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, if I become famous, I'm not doubting that it will be because of rapping. You never know. Rhain1999 (talk) 19:26, 13 February 2012 (AEST)
 * If you become famous, it won't be for the tracks/albums listed on the page currently. I'll make a mental note of this MfD for when you chart, since it's easy enough to undelete something Achowat (talk) 14:34, 16 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Pages which will almost undoubtedly not pass WP:GNG for quite some time, by which point the content would be useless. OSbornarfcontribs. 23:20, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per all the above.  Not yet.--Epeefleche (talk) 19:32, 16 February 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.