Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Richmond pharmacology

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 21:06, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

User:Richmond pharmacology


obvious spam, no edits by this user other than page creation UseTheCommandLine (talk) 09:18, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete unless someone can demonstrate notability for Richmond pharmacology, in which case it could go to mainspace. Two users worked on this, not one. I think it's more of a staledraft than a spam. -- Klein zach  14:58, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I did do a basic assessment for notability, because I came across it in my editing of another page (List of contract research organizations) and found little mention of it. The user page itself is relatively high in the google results list, and while there are a couple of industry blogs that mention it in passing, the overwhelming majority of the references to it are from company listings (e.g. by sector) or their ads recruiting for test subjects. Even if it were a staledraft, I would then wonder about WP:COI. -- UseTheCommandLine (talk) 20:16, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Grossly stale userspace draft in addition to being both a self coi (by the creator) the only other substantial editor appears to have a special interest in promoting Richmodn Pharmacology (adding references/links). Hasteur (talk) 21:11, 25 January 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.