Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Rick Conner

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:00, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

User:Rick Conner


Dubious medical analysis and advice (and dubious is an understatement) that clearly will never be integrated in an article. There's no reason to keep this in any namespace. Pichpich (talk) 14:38, 25 March 2013 (UTC)


 * They don't want the truth known. It's all about your Money.  If people are stupid to pay for Quacks.  Remember Chiropractors were once considered quacks!  No medical degree and only like this guy above just want your hard earned cash.  So if your stupid enough to give it to them then so be it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.197.73.224 (talk) 16:08, 25 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Wikipedia is not for advocacy, or How-to guides, and certainly not for unsourced medical advice.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:02, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NOTWEBHOST -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 00:37, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, obviously original research, and WP:NOTADVOCACY. hmssolent \Let's convene My patrols 11:14, 27 March 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.