Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Riffsyphon1024/Space exploration timeline


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. ( Radiant ) 08:28, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

User:Riffsyphon1024/Space exploration timeline
not Wikipedia related MECU ≈ talk 20:49, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and email him the wiki source because he might want it. I think we should have a new speedy deletion criteria for cases like this.  This clearly isn't Wikipedia-related and shouldn't need to go through a five day process.  -- Cyde Weys  17:32, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep If he chooses to keep a watchlist in this form, so what? Recentchanges on this page is an excellent way to keep track of several articles at once. Septentrionalis 20:15, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * It violates the guideline on userspaces. Specifically, that Wikipedia is not a free hosting service and userspaces should only be used for Wikipedia related matters. -- MECU ≈ talk 21:06, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Looks like a list of articles to me; that it is in a exportable form rather than a bare list is detail. Septentrionalis 22:39, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * In no way, shape, or form was this written as a watchlist. Stop being ridiculous.  -- Cyde Weys  23:24, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * How dare User:Cyde] march in here and declare that it wasn't a watchlist without the slightest bit of evidence that it isn't. It's perfectly plausible that it's a watchlist, and for that reason alone strong keep. Dave 18:47, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * It's an essay and a list of articles; if he's not keeping track of the articles as they change, why does he link to them? Why assume bad faith? Septentrionalis 04:17, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep there is no evidence that this is not Wikipedia related. It could be a watch list.  It could be a work space for a future article.  It may be beneficial and it's not hurting anything. Johntex\talk 18:35, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.