Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Robert K S/Jeopardy! set evolution

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:28, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Robert K S/Jeopardy! set evolution
Userspace draft, obvious attempt to thwart the repeated AFDs and WP:SALTing of Jeopardy! set evolution (see that article's deletion log). Only edits have been by an IP who clearly isn't Robert K S logged out (and I say obvious because said IP has edit warred with him on other Jeopardy! articles). Obvious violation of WP:UP since Robert K S isn't editing it. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 04:15, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose. While I haven't had time to give this content attention in some time, it is not "an attempt to thwart deletion" or salting (I was not aware of the salting and in any case the userfied version must predate any salting).  This is simply a placeholder for information I expect will ultimately be sourced and integrated into its proper place.  Not hurting anything by remaining here in the interim. Robert K S (talk) 19:54, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * You should probably read WP:STALEDRAFT then. User spaces are not indefinite storage areas for material that you "expect will ultimately be sourced". If you think it's important, save the coding in Notepad or something. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 02:08, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

All the same, I would appreciate it if this could be left where it is. Robert K S (talk) 03:41, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete This stale draft would need a significant rewrite to comply with policy, especially WP:NOR, WP:V, and WP:SYN. Even if this could be rewritten, the deletion rationale in the 2nd discussion would likely still apply.  RJaguar3 &#124; u &#124; t 02:59, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Userspace is not for indefinite storage of deleted content. MER-C 09:11, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE, which states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion." Because this page violates WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 09:40, 23 January 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.