Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Robin Miah/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. ✗ plicit  14:17, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

User:Robin Miah/sandbox

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Article not developed, this person is not prominent, poor sources, only one user editing Kpddg (talk) 08:38, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: WP:NOTFACEBOOK. Facebook Instagram and LinkedIn are definitely unsuitable sources, and as these are the sole sources, the entire page in poisoned by unacceptable source use. It appears to be a drive by autobiography, which is a misuse of Wikipedia. SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:44, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and SmokeyJoe.  Waddles  Gobbles 🍂 🦃 00:25, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, concurring with SmokeyJoe that this is a drive-by autobiography, and incomplete. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:39, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Questions. If it's in the user's sandbox, what are the reasons that these aren't good-faith test edits that are permitted? The arguments to delete rely upon the presumption that the user is doing something malicious with a "drive-by autobiography". This might well be the case; the user page for is very similar. Why aren't we considering them together? I don't object to deletion of the sandbox, but it should probably be a 2-for-1. — Mhawk10 (talk) 08:20, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTSOCIALNETWORK -- Lenticel ( talk ) 05:37, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.