Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Rollercoaster2428/Robb Alvey

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete, as no one found sources worth inclusion during the MFD..  MBisanz  talk 20:43, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

User:Rollercoaster2428/Robb Alvey


WP:STALEDRAFT. The user who created this page has not edited it or any page since October 2009. Since then the article has somehow been the target of vandalism. I recommend outright deletion or, if someone can make a case that this has potential to become an article, moving to WP:ABANDON. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 14:40, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

The person in question does not seem to have any credibility beyond shameless self promotion and I suggest deletion of this page. None of the facts in the article have been verified beyond his website. The man is a known fraud who was fired from Disney for embezzlement.
 * Comment about moving to ABANDON Some sources I found on him:, , , , and . Silver  seren C 05:35, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Move to article space, as I view this, this guy seems to meet notability, and this is a decent stub, and has good substantial sources (that should be copied to the talk page after the move and later moved to the article). While searching the name on Wikipedia, I see him used as a reference on a large number of roller coaster articles.  D O N D E groovily   Talk to me  04:15, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Fraudsters are notable. Deletion is not a substitution for improving the article (to cover the fraud aspect), and is not done just cause you don't like someone. D O N D E groovily   Talk to me  04:07, 14 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete But none of the claims in the article have been independently verified. These were fed in releases by him. This article reads as if this was self written. Blatant vanity/spam--how did it last this long? Violates WP:BIO and does not meet WP:GNG. First, subject does not satisfy the 'significant coverage' requirement. While there are articles that discuss him, many do so tangentially or in context of his website. His notability as an employee/spokesperson of a notable company fails my interpretation of WP:BIO. I fail to see any reliable and third-party sources. All of them either are not reliable, or not independent of the subject. Most are both. He is no more notable than any other self-promoting person, articles on whom which have been deleted in their masses from Wikipedia. He is not a notable figure as per Wikipedia guidlines and I suspect the article has been self-promoted or even self-created.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.