Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ronin.shinta


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was '''keep. The user agrees with the content, and it doesn't violate WP policy.''' — M e ts 501 (talk) 20:59, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

User:Ronin.shinta
This is a user page which is seemingly nonsense, and none of it was actually written by User:Ronin.shinta. — M e ts 501 (talk) 18:48, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Ronin.shinta is a good friend of mine and I see no reason why his userpage should be deleted. The edits by 65.96.253.2 are his, so he has actually editted some of the page himself. AlexJohnc3 18:50, 17 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Dear Mets man, I have no idea how to format a wikipedia conversation thingy because frankly wikipedia sucks, but I do approve of Alexjohnc3's little silly userboxes, seeing as it is ok he is a silly little wikipedian, as silly wikipedians like to call themself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronin.shinta (talk • contribs)


 * The user agrees with the content of his userpage and therefore it should be kept, correct? AlexJohnc3 19:20, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

I don't care about self righteous wikipedians, but that green box is impeding Alex's little peice of art about me. It's going down lol. --Shinta 19:29, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

OK, no problem, I will withdraw this nomination if in fact you are OK with this userpage, Ronin.shinta. — M e ts 501 (talk) 20:58, 17 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.