Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ruchirabajaj


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was del abuse of user space. User is long inactive `'mikka 21:09, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

User:Ruchirabajaj
Personal essays. Wikipedia is not a free web host. Also nominated is User:Richard Hill. Users has made few encyclopedic contributions and have not been seen for months. MER-C 06:00, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:NOT, inappropriate use of userpage. Ter e nce Ong 06:11, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:NOT, inappropriate use of userpage.  Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim  02:29, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. I read the article. It's sourced, and less POV than most of the articles on economics and politics in article space. A newbie, who probably won't be back to know he's been bitten; but, if he does come back, he won't have learned the differences between this and what we want, either. I considered a Weak keep, on the grounds that this is unlikely ever to matter, if he doesn't return; but, if so, the only effect of this deletion will be to waste one more edit's worth of storage. Septentrionalis 06:06, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep on same basis as Septentrionalis. Must admit that I was amused Encarta was cited as a source though. :) Orderinchaos78 14:02, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete One user's been gone for 19 months, while the other made a few edits to his userpage seven months ago and has never been seen again. WP:NOT applies. And not to crystal ball, but who knows- maybe someone else will want the username Richard Hill. -- Kicking222 02:36, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Seven months? That's delete for me. - Mailer Diablo 03:07, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep for User:Ruchirabajaj since the user has productive edits. Delete for Richard Hill having none. JoshuaZ 04:25, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete -why are these things even contested? BigDT 07:21, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * keep informative, but not reely a userpage...
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.